- The Karnataka High Court struck down a state law that increased reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). - The court declared the legislation unconstitutional, highlighting the violation of constitutional limits and principles regarding reservations. - The ruling reinforces the legal debate surrounding reservation ceilings and the judicial review of affirmative action laws in India. - **Supreme Court of India:** The highest constitutional court in India, which established the binding 50% ceiling on reservation quotas in the landmark Indra Sawhney judgment. - **Karnataka High Court:** The constitutional court of Karnataka that struck down the state's 2022 law enhancing SC/ST reservations for breaching the 50% ceiling and violating Articles 14, 15, and 16. **Introduction** The Karnataka High Court has struck down a state law that sought to increase reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), declaring it unconstitutional. This ruling touches upon core constitutional debates regarding reservation caps, judicial review, and affirmative action policies in India. **Core Issue and Detailed Points** - The Karnataka High Court struck down a state law that increased reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). - The court declared the legislation unconstitutional, highlighting the violation of constitutional limits and principles regarding reservations. - The ruling reinforces the legal debate surrounding reservation ceilings and the judicial review of affirmative action laws in India. **Key Statutory Bodies, Acts & Concepts** - **Supreme Court of India:** The highest constitutional court in India, which established the binding 50% ceiling on reservation quotas in the landmark Indra Sawhney judgment. - **Karnataka High Court:** The constitutional court of Karnataka that struck down the state's 2022 law enhancing SC/ST reservations for breaching the 50% ceiling and violating Articles 14, 15, and 16.