- The Supreme Court expressed strong displeasure over the failure of several States and Union Territories to respond to the Centre's communication regarding a national policy on menstrual hygiene. - The apex court is monitoring the formulation of a uniform national policy and standard operating procedures (SOPs) for menstrual hygiene management, focusing on school-going girls and rural areas. - The case highlights persistent challenges in cooperative federalism, particularly regarding the implementation of social welfare and public health schemes across states. - Lack of uniform state responses impedes effective nationwide public health interventions for adolescent reproductive health and sanitation. - **Supreme Court:** The apex judicial body of India, which has ruled that menstrual health and hygiene are integral parts of the fundamental right to life with dignity under Article 21. - **Centre:** The Central Government of India, tasked with formulating a comprehensive national policy on menstrual hygiene and coordinating its implementation across various States and UTs. **Introduction** The Supreme Court of India expressed strong dissatisfaction with various States and Union Territories for failing to respond to the Central government regarding a comprehensive national policy on menstrual hygiene. Emphasizing the importance of menstrual health, sanitation, and education for adolescent girls, the Court's strict observation underscores institutional bottlenecks in cooperative federalism and public health governance. **Core Issue and Detailed Points** - The Supreme Court expressed strong displeasure over the failure of several States and Union Territories to respond to the Centre's communication regarding a national policy on menstrual hygiene. - The apex court is monitoring the formulation of a uniform national policy and standard operating procedures (SOPs) for menstrual hygiene management, focusing on school-going girls and rural areas. - The case highlights persistent challenges in cooperative federalism, particularly regarding the implementation of social welfare and public health schemes across states. - Lack of uniform state responses impedes effective nationwide public health interventions for adolescent reproductive health and sanitation. **Key Statutory Bodies, Acts & Concepts** - **Supreme Court:** The apex judicial body of India, which has ruled that menstrual health and hygiene are integral parts of the fundamental right to life with dignity under Article 21. - **Centre:** The Central Government of India, tasked with formulating a comprehensive national policy on menstrual hygiene and coordinating its implementation across various States and UTs.